A Virus over the Internet

The Guardian reports today it obtained a (consciously modified) sequence of the deadly smallpox virus over the Internet.

Revealed: the lax laws that could allow assembly of deadly virus DNA“.
It paid just 40 pounds (some US$80) for it. The paper states that some well-funded and organized individuals, with access to PhD-level personnel may build a virus from scratch using DNA sequences. If the smallpox virus (which is extinct, except for labs) infected only 10 persons, it would spread to 2.2 million people in 180 days, the newspaper reports. This calls for urgent, regulatory and international laws.

Posted in general | Leave a comment

More google

Well, that was not enough. In terms of information, there are two or three new services from Google Labs that really stand out.

First, the Google Related Links that one might post on one site, which open up a series of worthy doors to explore, with links dynamically presented which are connected with one’s site.

Second, and this might be useful to researchers, there is Google Trends. Suffice it to digit “Arts, Science” into its box, and one gets a graphical comparison of the two searches. What is people more interested with: arts or science? One would discover that in th US and Italy and most western world, it is Arts. In India, though, it’s Science!

Third, there is Google Co-op: “a platform which enables you to use your expertise to help other users find information.” Thus, I might just get a chance to contribute my knowledge for your searches! This sounds like tapping from human knowledge. I haven’t analyzed it yet, though, so I’ll post on this again, with more information.

Posted in general, tools | Leave a comment

Sparklin’ Google

Well, it’s been a while. Working on a project in New York for the month of June. Little time. Whatever.

But, I just would like to share a comment on Google’s activity, since it seems it is going to propose itself as the real consolidator of not only information, but also of web services.

We already knew about the calendar (calendar.google.com). Before, there was the buying of Writely (www.writely.com, a word processing web service that is being integrated into G’s platform). Now we’re talking about web publishing (real no-fuzz web pages to be created in instants: pages.google.com), online spreadsheets (spreadsheets.google.com), and… yes, the cream on top of it all: note-taking: the Google Notebook -www.google.com/notebook. This is in my opinion the jewel of the crown (at least for the moment). In fact, Google is even integrating all this tools into one “personalized web page”. The idea is not new (Yahoo! had it first). But Google is the first to add personalizable services, beyond information.

Let us see: with Goggle Notebook you can:

Add clippings of text, images and links from web pages […] without ever leaving your browser window. You can organize your notes. You can create multiple notebooks, divide them into sections, and drag-and-drop your notes to stay organized.” Plus, you can -of course!- share your Google Notebook with the world by making it public.

It sounds too good, and it certainly is. 

Now let us consider it all: Google is transforming itself into a magical desktop of information and tools/services, all web-based. This means we won’t need to leave our browser (good news for Firefox, its open architecture is just done for this!). Of course this are great news for Google itself, since it is gaining access, gratis, to our lives, our private information, our writing, our ideas, whatever flows through our minds. Can you figure myself doing my taxes spreadsheet on Google? What if that information goes into the wrong hands? I might not get that mortgage I’d like! Or worse.
So, the whole picture is missing some big words here: trust. What is Google willing to do to deserve (really deserve!) our trust?

Actually a lot, lately. I read about a Sergey talk on the idea Google might suspend its deal with China, regarding censorship. I don’t know if ot will happen, but it is a discourse worth following.

Posted in philosophic-discourse, tools | Leave a comment

The Timeline Tool

“The timeline tool is a web based learning object template which allows an instructor to quickly construct an interactive timeline with audio and visual effects. The finished timeline can serve as a re-useable learning object”: Learning Tools – UBC Arts.

From Learning Tools – University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada.

Posted in learning-objects, tools | Leave a comment

The New Media

The Economist has a great review (survey, they call it) of personal and participatory media, such as blogs, wikis, and other beasts. It begins with an article (“Among the audience”: Among the audience | Economist.com) which shows how, starting with the Movable printing press, up to the “Movable Type” blog revolution,

People no longer passively “consume” media but actively participate in them, which usually means creating content, in whatever form and on whatever scale.
-Paul Saffo, as quoted in the paper.

This is part of what I like to call the Infrastructure of Possibilities.

The survey goes on explaining what blogs and wikis are, with practical tips also. It includes audio interviews with (among others) David Sifry (founder of Technorati), and Paul Saffo (Director at the Institute of the Future (iftf.org)).

Here’s the table o’contents.

Posted in general | Leave a comment