Just a bit late: More films from 2025

I’ve been watching a few films in late 2025. Among those I loved the most I want to remember:

  • A double tour (Web of Passion) C. Chabrol
  • Peeping Tom
  • Requiem for a Dream (D. Aronofski, 2000)
  • Little Children
  • The substance
  • La nuit américaine (Day for Night), Truffaut 1973
  • Rifkin’s Festival & Coup de chance

I just want to talk about how much fun I had watching them all. Sure, À double tour is fantastic and it deserved a stand-alone post, here.

So, I’ll share some impressions on some others, like the two films with Jennifer Connelly, Requiem for a Dream and Little Children. Later I’ll have one post dedicated to Woody Allen’s Rifkin’s Festival and another to Truffaut’s La nuit américaine. And yet another for The Substance, of all the most recent production, and what a production. That’s quite a plan. But here I’ll just share why they all made my day.

Screenshot from Requiem for a Dream

Screenshot from Requiem for a Dream

Requiem for a Dream is a dark movie and it will hit you. Aronofski builds a story around one young man and his mother, who is soon put into the center stage. The man is insecure, son of a provincial suburban community. His future is not an American dream but instead a free money dream which will soon become a nightmare of drugs and lost lives. He drives his girlfriend into this maelstrom, in which dreams are eaten alive. You got it: Jennifer Connelly plays this beautiful, young girl from the provinces–but from an easy-money family. What are their interests and values? She falls in the escape drugs black hole; while the mother falls into a diet trap. All fall into a black-hole hallucination, a descent into hell–and nobody ever gets out of those. The mother is Ellen Burstyn in a memorable interpretation of another American myth: Why All Them Can and I Can’t? Drugs and Diet will take the mind and life of this oldish woman and consume her. Aronofski is a master at painting this character with sour strong satire. Connelly gives one her best acting shows of her life, a destructive youngster who’s addicted to drugs.

The film starts plain and simple, but then tends to grow with darker and darker colors. I found the film disturbing and absolutely hopeless in its views–no optimism possible, there. But I enjoyed it greatly. Then, there is Little Children, a melodrama of two couples and one infidelity. It is a so well constructed story, and so well acted, one remains stitched to the screen. Very good storytelling, featuring the great myth of the American suburban family and escaping out of that golden jail built between the family conventions (including the children) and the enclosed enclave, the gated middle-class communities.

Poster from Little Children

Poster from Little Children

Sure, the pair of Kate Winslet plus Connelly helps!

Screenshot from Rifkin's Festival, quoting Bergman

Screenshot from Rifkin’s Festival, quoting Bergman

The reason why I enjoyed so much Rifkin’s Festival is that it’s a film on cinema. Nobody (that I know of) has ever published any irony on Bergman or Rossellini. But Woody Allen does it with such a grace and love it is an immense fun. Woody talks about cinema and… you’ll see in a next post.

I have left last both Peeping Tom and The substance, one old movie together with a latest production, both terror films. The latter will merit a post of its own soon, since I found it so enjoyable (if you wish) because it quotes other movies–a lot of movies, and I love that game.

Screenshot from Peeping Tom

Screenshot from Peeping Tom

Peeping Tom is a noir from 1960 about a filmmaker who shoots his victims. A young man, he kills women while shooting a film with them starring, so to speak. A beautiful construction on the act of viewing–a game between us, the viewers of his doings and his victims while he creates and tells a story. A classic that I wanted to watch again.

Truffaut’s La nuit américaine (Day for Night) is my answer to continue with my self-teaching about French films. Chabrol and Rohmer I know and continue to watch their films even if some say Rohmer’s are boring. I find them fascinating. I’ll say this of Day for Night (it’s the technique used by film-makers to shoot a night scene during the day with a dark filter to make it seem like night. This is what’s called Day for Night, or in French, the American Night.

 

Posted in films | Tagged | Leave a comment

La guerra è bella anche se fa male

La guerra è bella anche se fa male
[War is beautiful, even though it hurts]
(from the song Generale by Francesco De Gregori)

Cinema buffs have recently resurfaced a very political and compelling film by Oliver Stone, W., by posting a short clip from it that has gone viral: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmwM9EXyczw

The film portrays the geopolitical strategy the US has been playing in the past and foresees, with precision, its Iranian interests up to now. Boom!

Links:

 

Posted in films, short | Tagged | Leave a comment

Once Upon a Time / Érase una vez…

Mi presentación en el II Simposio de Innovación Educativa, Universidad del Sagrado Corazón, 13 de junio de 2025.

Posted in abierto, innovation, open web, zenofteaching | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The most beautiful in the world

Why, oh why. Marketing, perhaps. A nice guy, former mayor of Rome. Peaceful, cinema-lover. Writes novels, some detective stories, and now this. The most beautiful in the world. Referring to the Constitution of Italy. Why do we need to say that our stuff is the best? “Our” here means any stuff that is part of one’s own culture.

foto of book cover on Italian Constitution

La più bella del mondo

Typically, Italians say or think this (including me?), the French say this, Americans (US subjects) say or think this. But I never heard Canadians and Brits say this. The best, the most powerful, the most democratic, etc., in all its splendid variations. Well, I’m tired of this habit, a forma mentis that empowers the various nationalisms, the West vs East, the North vs South.

Talking about West and East, I’m quite irremediably allergic to the very idea of Western Civilization (WC), for a few reasons I’ll deal with later. So I’m happy that John Naughton from The Guardian, a journalist I follow through his blog Memex 1.1, says he’s

[…] temperamentally suspicious of the ‘Western civilisation’ trope. Would that be the civilisation that launched two devastating world wars, by any chance? And colonised and looted half the world?

Touché.

Or perhaps WC is simply a propaganda idea to make believe that there exists (and existed in the past) a comprehensive, stable, closed thing that includes all ‘the West” and by definition excludes the East and possibly the South? It sounds bullshit to me.

This is why I’m so glad that through one of those serendipitous moments and links Alan Levine is so fond of, I rediscovered a full(ish) quote from Mahatma Gandhi himself. The very John Naughton told the story of Gandhi being interviewed by a flock of Fleet Street reporters upon his visit to England in 1931:

“Mr Gandhi, what do you think of Western Civilisation?” To which the great man smiled benevolently and replied: “Ah, Western Civilisation; now that would be a good idea.”

Case closed.

Says Naoíse Mac Sweeney on her writing a new history of the West:

Western Civilization is therefore not just a myth in the sense that it is a fiction that we tell ourselves, despite knowing that it is factually false. It is a myth that was invented to justify slavery, imperialism, and oppression. As such, it served the ideological needs of the time of its invention, reflecting the core values of the society that produced it.

Yet the modern West today does not have the same core values as it did three hundred years ago. We do not need an origin myth that is fundamentally at odds with contemporary Western values such as liberal democracy, the rule of law, and equality of human rights; undeniably rooted in imperialism and white supremacy. If we want to strengthen Western identity around our modern Western values, we therefore need to tear down the myth of Western Civilization.
–From Why the Idea of Western Civilization is More Myth Than History.

Here’s a link to her book.

BTW, John Naughton’s Memex 1.1 blog is fantastic: please subscribe!

Posted in general, philosophic-discourse | Tagged | Leave a comment

First film of 2025: Web of Passion (À Double Tour)

FIRST film of 2025. An oldie, from 1959, the year of my birth. By Claude Chabrol, it’s À double tour (A doppia mandata, Una doble vida, Web of Passion),

A double Tour, poster

a noir set in Provence, with lots of sun and green. Also a lot of bourgeoisie, which Chabrol detests. In fact, the best character is this lad with the hungarian name Laslo Kovacs, interpreted by Jean-Paul Belmondo. Vulgar, likes pastis and talks like he sees it, the exact opposite of the family living in this beautiful Provencal villa.

A character so different from the house lady, interpreted by the magnifique et très antipathique Madeleine Robinson. The other character, off and charming, is the young housemaid, who loves to show off from her window in her brassiere.

Beginning sequence: the maid’s window show-off

Conflict arises when the man of the house expresses publicly his love for a young lady living nearby. The wife hates this, but she is not the killer. Enter the couple’s son (Jacques Dacqmine, has an appearance as an old man in The Ninth Gate), a mom’s puppet, effeminate and passive, until his very first and last decision. The last sequence is memorable: the hard dialog between the killer and the lover (Antonella Lualdi): his relationship with his mother, the self-hate he has, comparing himself with an insect that promptly lurks on the mirror, that is shattered by his rage.

Here’s the near-to-last sequence. It’s self-explanatory.

Confrontation

Mirror

The lover

Shattered

Close

The killing

A lot of Hitchcock in the filming and tension building and also in the music.

Then one of the most memorable corridors in cinema’s history. Here:

Corridor: death

Corridor zoom out

That’s it. Loved the movie.

Posted in films | Tagged | Leave a comment